How Ultra-High-Net-Worth Families Allocate Capital — And How It’s Changing
Editorial note: This article is educational, not investment advice. Data points reference reputable family office surveys and allocator research. Figures vary by region, mandate, and vintage year.
The Modern Family Office Portfolio: From “Endowment Model” to “Everything Model”
Ultra-wealthy families once built portfolios around a core of public equities and municipal/sovereign bonds, with real estate and a few hedge funds for ballast. Over the last decade, that template has morphed into what advisers jokingly call the “Everything Model”: liquid public markets for beta and optionality, a large commitment to private markets for return dispersion, and a growing sleeve of opportunistic credit, secondaries, co-investments, and—selectively—digital assets. In the 2024–2025 cycle, several large surveys show a clear re-balancing: equities in developed markets regained share after the 2022–2023 drawdowns, fixed income weights rose on higher yields, while private equity and real estate allocations moderated slightly from peak levels—but remain core.
Where Allocations Sit Today (and Why)
Across global family offices, recent surveys show traditional assets (public stocks, bonds, cash) and alternatives (private equity, venture, private credit, real estate, hedge funds) are now in rough equilibrium—often ~50/50 with meaningful dispersion by region and risk appetite. UBS’s 2025 update notes developed-market equities rising to the mid-20s percent on average, while alternatives still command ~40–50% when tallied across private equity, real estate, hedge funds and other private exposures. Goldman Sachs reports similar findings and highlights a steady inching up of private credit weights and persistently high cash reserves used tactically for dislocations.
| Building Block | Typical Range* (Global FO Average) | Why It’s There |
|---|---|---|
| Public Equities (Developed + EM) | 25–35% | Growth engine, liquidity, efficient beta; renewed interest post-reset in valuations. |
| Fixed Income | 15–25% | Income and ballast; higher yields restored bonds’ role in 2024–2025. |
| Private Equity (funds + directs) | 15–25% | Return dispersion, control via directs, access to secular growth themes. |
| Private Real Estate | 5–12% | Inflation linkage, income; tactically underweight office, selective in logistics/resi. |
| Private Credit / Direct Lending | 3–8% (and rising) | 9–12% yields in senior secured deals; strong demand amid bank retrenchment. |
| Hedge Funds | 0–10% | Diversification, downside mitigation, idiosyncratic alpha. |
| Cash & T-Bills | 5–15% | Dry powder for secondaries and co-investments; optionality premium. |
| Crypto / Digital Assets | 0–5% | Asymmetric upside, store-of-value thesis (Bitcoin), and tech exposure; still selective. |
Behind these bands are distinct narratives: family offices sought yield and risk dampening in 2024’s bond market, trimmed real estate (especially traditional office) while leaning into credit opportunities, and kept alternatives central even as private equity pacing cooled with slower exits. In North America, many offices maintained a home-bias to U.S. public markets and tech; in Europe and parts of APAC, allocators leaned more into fixed income and selectively into private credit and infrastructure.
Public Equities: Back to Work
Equities are the oxygen of UHNW portfolios: scalable, liquid, and tax-manageable. After 2022’s drawdown and the 2023–2024 rebound, family offices increased developed-market equity weights, citing renewed earnings growth, the AI and electrification cycles, and improved risk/reward relative to private deals with elongated exits. UBS and media coverage of its survey show developed equities rising into the mid-20s percent on average in 2024, with U.S. offices higher still. The forward view is pragmatic: keep public equity as the compounding core while reserving dry powder for episodic dislocations via sector ETFs and quality compounders.
Fixed Income: Yield Is Back, and Families Noticed
For a decade, bonds were ballast without much income. The rate reset changed that. In 2024, family offices lifted allocations to high-quality developed-market fixed income to the highest levels seen in five years in UBS’s data. The playbook: barbell duration (short bills for optionality, intermediate IG for carry), opportunistic structured credit via specialists, and careful use of municipals for tax efficiency. Bond allocations now serve three purposes: income, diversification against risk assets, and a parking lot for staged deployment into private opportunities.
Private Equity: From Fever Pitch to Disciplined Pacing
Private equity became the defining allocation of the last cycle—especially among $1B+ families who can endure illiquidity. In 2023, global family offices often showed ~22% in PE at the peak; by 2024 that edged down to ~21% as exits slowed and financing costs rose. Still, it remains a core pillar. Two shifts stand out: first, a measured tilt from directs toward funds/funds-of-funds to regain diversification after a period of heavy direct activity; second, greater interest in secondaries and continuation vehicles to manage liquidity and vintage risk.
Regionally, Campden’s work shows North America family offices steadily growing total private markets share (PE, VC, private debt) to rival or exceed public equities, while European offices signaled plans to increase direct PE as rates eventually stabilize. The most sophisticated families now run PE like a program: multi-manager primaries, active co-investments for fee/return enhancement, and disciplined pacing to avoid vintage clustering.
Private Real Estate: Selectivity Over Scale
Real estate’s role is changing. Family offices trimmed allocations in 2023–2024, particularly in traditional office where cap-rates and financing frictions bit hardest. The remaining sleeve skews to resilient niches: logistics with long-dated tenants, data centers and digital infrastructure, necessity retail and select residential strategies. Opportunistic capital waits in the wings for distress, but underwriting has become forensic: lease rolls, operating partners’ track records, and debt stack stability matter more than ever.
Private Credit: From Niche to Necessary
Private credit is the allocation story of the moment. As banks retrenched, direct lenders filled the gap—often at attractive, floating-rate yields with strong covenants. Goldman Sachs’ family office research shows allocations rising (≈4% global average in 2025, up from ~3%), and multiple surveys indicate an intent to keep increasing. Even more telling: the rapidly growing private-credit secondaries market, which has expanded sharply since 2022 and is projected to grow again in 2025, giving allocators new liquidity and portfolio management tools.
Hedge Funds: Fewer, Better, and with a Job to Do
Hedge fund allocations have become more surgical. About a third of family offices use them primarily for diversification and risk control, not as core return drivers. Mandates favor multi-strategy platforms with robust risk systems, constrained net exposure, and lower beta to equities. Macro and trend-following re-entered lineups to complement private credit and equity risk. The recurrent theme: hedge funds must either protect on the downside or monetize dislocation—otherwise the capital migrates to private credit or opportunistic equity.
Cash: Optionality Is Alpha
It’s unfashionable to praise cash in bull markets, but family offices treat cash as live ammunition. After 2022, many raised T-bill reserves both for 5%+ risk-free carry and to pounce on secondaries, rescue financings, or public sell-offs. Goldman’s family office work and other surveys consistently show elevated cash levels versus pre-COVID norms—an explicit decision to trade some short-term return for the ability to act quickly.
Crypto & Digital Assets: From Curiosity to Considered Sleeve
Digital assets are no longer a novelty topic in family office boardrooms. Goldman’s 2025 press release notes roughly one-third of family offices now invest in crypto (up from ~26% in 2023), with adoption strongest in APAC. Other research shows many are at least exploring the space, often carving out a small sleeve focused on Bitcoin as a store-of-value complement and allocating via spot ETFs or institutional custody rather than retail exchanges. Still, allocations typically remain single-digits given regulatory, custody, and volatility considerations.
How the Mix Has Evolved: A Short History of a Long Cycle
2010–2016: The endowment playbook diffuses into family offices: alternatives rise (PE/VC/hedge), public equity dominates returns, bonds anchor but pay little. 2017–2019: The direct investing boom; families co-invest alongside GPs, chase tech growth, and add real estate income. 2020–2021: Policy liquidity fuels private valuations; venture soars; cash drops; hedge fund lineups consolidate. 2022: Inflation shock; duration pain in bonds; public tech reprices; families raise cash and lean into private credit. 2023–2025: Re-risk to developed equities, cautious pacing in PE, higher fixed income, rising interest in secondaries and private-credit opportunities; crypto moves from experiment to small strategic sleeve.
Regional Nuance: Why the Mix Looks Different in New York, Zurich, Dubai, and Singapore
North American families exhibit a pronounced home-bias, overweight U.S. public equities and tech, with larger absolute allocations to private equity and direct deals. European families showed greater increases to fixed income in 2024 and a pragmatic stance on real estate repricing, while APAC offices report higher crypto interest and faster willingness to tilt into public equities during momentum phases. In all regions, private credit is a shared enthusiasm—especially where bank lending has tightened.
Tactics That Matter: Pacing, Secondaries, and Governance
Beyond headline weights, sophistication shows up in the tactics. Families increasingly smooth private equity pacing to avoid vintage risk, blend primaries with secondaries to pull forward cash yields, and use continuation vehicles selectively to manage asset-level liquidity. In private credit, they negotiate for reporting transparency, covenant strength, and manager alignment; several are exploring secondary transactions to curate exposures mid-life. Hedge fund mandates are consolidation plays: fewer managers with clearer roles. Real estate committees now triage by sector microeconomics first, macro second.
What’s Next: The Playbook for 2025–2027
Surveys from UBS, Goldman, and others suggest a steady hand: keep public equity as the compounding core; harvest bond income while rates remain supportive; run private equity with disciplined pacing and higher bar for new directs; grow the private-credit sleeve, including secondaries; stay selective in real estate with a bias to cash-flow assets; retain a working cash buffer for opportunistic deployment; and treat crypto as a small, institutionally-custodied sleeve with clear risk limits. The biggest meta-trend is professionalization: operating costs and talent investment are rising as families build institutional-grade investment offices.
Snapshot Tables
| Allocation Trend (Global FO) | 2023–2025 Direction | Drivers / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Developed Market Equities | ↑ | Valuation reset, AI/electrification themes, relative liquidity. 16 |
| Fixed Income | ↑ | Highest weight in 5 years on real yields; ballast restored. 17 |
| Private Equity | ↔ / slight ↓ | Still core; pacing moderated; more funds vs directs; rising use of secondaries. 18 |
| Private Real Estate | ↓ then selective | Office challenged; tilt to logistics, resi, data centers. 19 |
| Private Credit | ↑ | Rising allocations; secondaries market expanding rapidly. 20 |
| Hedge Funds | ↔ | Used by ~1/3 for diversification and downside control. 21 |
| Cash | ↑ | T-bill carry + optionality for dislocations. 22 |
| Crypto | ↑ (small) | ~33% adoption; typically low single-digit weights via ETFs/custody. 23 |
Operating context: Many family offices report sizable budgets and institutional practices—J.P. Morgan cites ~45% in alternatives on average among respondents and ~$3.2M annual operating costs—reflecting the professionalization of governance, risk, and manager selection.
Conclusion: The Shape of Durable Capital
The UHNW portfolio today is less a pie chart than a toolkit. Public equities compound and signal; bonds pay again; private equity and credit harvest complexity premia; real estate is chosen, not assumed; hedge funds earn keep through crisis and dispersion; cash is ammunition; and crypto is a cautiously sized option on a new monetary and technology regime. The common thread is intentionality: families choose each sleeve for a job, measure outcomes against that job, and adapt as cycles turn. That discipline—more than any particular percentage—is what preserves wealth across generations.
–